Pronouns, presuppositions, and semantic variation

نویسنده

  • Lisa Matthewson
چکیده

This paper addresses the question of whether and how the semantics of third-person pronouns can vary across languages. I investigate third-person non-demonstrative pronouns in St’át’imcets (Lillooet Salish), including null pro and its overt animate plural counterpart wit. I provide evidence for a striking cross-linguistic difference between the St’át’imcets pronouns and English ones: third-person non-demonstrative pronouns in St’át’imcets lack familiarity effects (cf. also Davis 2006). These pronouns may introduce new discourse referents, they allow apparent ‘backwards pronominalization’ in situations in which English disallows it, and they behave in other respects like indefinites (e.g., they participate in sluicing). A novel pronoun is illustrated in (1) (from Davis 2006); the phenomenon is widespread and not limited to a literary register:

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Indexical Presuppositions of Pronominal Gender Features

Gender features on anaphoric pronouns are often analyzed as presupposition triggers, after [Cooper, 1983]. I argue that, first, “presuppositions” arising in sentences with gendered pronouns have a peculiar projection behavior different from that of regular presuppositions, and second, that such special indexical presuppositions, rather than being contributed by morphological features directly, ...

متن کامل

PRESUPPOSITION PROJECTION as PROOF CONSTRUCTION

Van der Sandt s anaphoric account of presupposition is gen erally considered to be the theory which makes the best empiri cal predictions about presupposition projection see e g Beaver The main insight is that there is an interesting cor respondence between the behavior of anaphoric pronouns in dis course and the projection of presuppositions in complex sentences Van der Sandt proposes to resol...

متن کامل

Presuppositions in Context: Constructing Bridges

Traditionally, a distinction is made between that what is asserted by uttering a sentence and that what is presupposed. Presuppositions are characterized as those propositions which persist even if the sentence which triggers them is negated. Thus ‘The king of France is bald’ presupposes that there is a king of France, since this follows from both ‘The king of France is bald’ and ‘It is not the...

متن کامل

Presuppositions, provisos, and probability

Theories of presupposition in the tradition associated with Karttunen, Stalnaker and Heim relate presupposition satisfaction to the content of conversational participants’ epistemic states, usually modeled as sets of worlds. However, converging evidence from recent work on modality and from other areas of cognitive science suggests that epistemic states are better thought of as having the riche...

متن کامل

Semantic Typology and Parallel Corpora: Something about Indefinite Pronouns

Patterns of crosslinguistic variation in the expression of word meaning are informative about semantic organization, but most methods to study this are labor intensive and obscure the gradient nature of concepts. We propose an automatic method for extracting crosslinguistic co-categorization patterns from parallel texts, and explore the properties of the data as a potential source for automatic...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2008